Microsoft Office vs. OpenOffice

Microsoft Office vs. OpenOffice Microsoft Office vs. OpenOffice

Typing documents, use of spreadsheets and slideshows are essential tools in the life of almost every professional. The largest of the problems found in Microsoft Office according to the vast majority of users is its price, quite high in the opinion of many. This obligation on having to pay for an Office application suite has stimulated the development of OpenOffice, completely free and open source. Therefore, in addition to the constant improvement in its development, free version divides increasingly user’s opinion about who is the best. We put these two opponents in the ring and help you choose the champion!

Meet the Fighters

In the right corner, wearing red, yellow, blue and green and bearing the title of most widely used suite of applications in the world is Microsoft Office. Coaching for over two decades in Microsoft complex and showing increasingly novelties, the package prides itself for ease of use, user friendliness, functionality and various other characteristics quite evident in the 2007 release.

On the left, only wearing black and blue, with two birds tattooed on arm is the OpenOffice. Keeps getting better with unique functions and indisputable functionality, the day of the great duel arrived!

To defend the applications we have Bill, supporter of Microsoft Office, and Franco, fanatic by possibilities present in OpenOffice.

Round 1: Price

When it comes to install some paid program on your computer, the relationship between cost and benefit always comes up. What does Franco has to say about it, since OpenOffice is free?

One of the reasons that fostered the creation of OpenOffice was exactly the chance of having all these possibilities in a manner free of charge. Many people and especially small businesses can’t afford to have the Microsoft Office on all machines. But the support and the guarantees offered by Microsoft justify this value.

Round 2: Usability

Microsoft Office: In each new version of Microsoft Office, considerable improvements are made to the usability of the set. Wizards, help resources specific to each situation and more organized interface are constantly rethought topics by developers. Within the applications you can access different topics in Office help. Idea is always been to promote a set of easy-to-use applications and you nailed it over the years with the exception of those annoying paperclips that appeared in the corner of the computer screen.

OpenOffice: We offer extremely simple usage and any user of Microsoft Office won’t feel big differences when choosing OpenOffice. In addition to help resources present in MS Office package, OpenOffice have gigantic communities scattered over the Internet ready to remedy the concerns of users at any level of difficulty. This is one of the advantages of open source thought.

Round 3: Compatibility

OpenOffice: Since our first version, a passion for creating own formats, while retaining full compatibility with the already known as a whole. The user can choose any one of them, without loss in the operation or compatibility.

Microsoft Office: The goal of new formats essentially makes files lighter and faster to open. Simply use the “Save as” function for this. We create updates for Office 2003 that allows you to view files from Office 2007 without any problems.

Round 4: Tools

Microsoft Office: In all these years of development, we create the most varied kinds of tools for the entire Office package to meet the needs of users, very satisfied with the range of options and configurations available.

Open Office: All essential functions in our applications meet fully the desire of our users. Some functions such as the option to save files in PDF were first created in OpenOffice and now are present in Microsoft Office application.

Round 5: Interface

Microsoft Office: We created a system of tabs with groups visible on each page, which allows the user, in particular the beginner to learn to deal with applications faster. In addition to functional and organized, the look of the new Office is much more beautiful.

OpenOffice: Who was accustomed to the old menus may not have liked these drastic changes in how they deal with the functions. You don’t even have the option to choose between the new and the old interface. We have a passion for keeping everything as it always did. Very few adjustments have been made because our users never need to learn twice to stir in OpenOffice interface.

Round 6: Performance

Microsoft Office: In the vast majority of tests performed, our suite of applications is up to four times lighter in memory to run. All programs also work independently and problems in one of them do not affect the whole. Processing to use our package is minimal.

OpenOffice: Microsoft suite has been optimized to run on Windows. Our programs are made in Java and are well known to all platforms, which unfortunately require a bit more memory and processing. But with the value that you save with OpenOffice, you can buy more memory or processor.

Round 7: Your Choice

We have pointed out some of the biggest arguments used by advocates of Microsoft Office and OpenOffice, in a battle in which by far the biggest winner is you. Competition creates the need for improvements and innovations in smaller timeframes, always with the user’s preference in focus. Do you have something to add about the applications mentioned? Be sure to participate and agitate for further dispute!

  • Diego

    Great article. I think in this comparison Apple iWork should also be included.

  • Vivek Thakar

    MS Office becomes a very costly solution for a Company. With the help of Open Office you can almost grow seamlessly. I am with OpenOffice.org

  • ned flanders

    I started using OO a few years ago because of price. pure and simple.
    I knew little of free/libre software back then but I knew that word processors do the same thing.

    I then started using Thunderbird, FF and VLC around the same time and when the Linux desktop was finally usable for the family 2 years ago, we made the jump en masse.

    We have gotten rid of our Office licenses at the small non-profit my wife works at and the 20 people there dont seem to have problems figuring it out.

    Ive probably used 7-8 word processors on three OS this past 2 years and they all look the same so there is very little adjustement needed. Well, unless its the Office Ribbon which was a boon to my cousins tech consulting company since they train office personnel. He absolutely loves the Ribbon for the new car and house he’s been able to afford.

    So the price is good, the usability is good and freedom/not being locked in is good too.

    Its still one of my must have apps along with FF and VLC that I propose to all my friends.

  • Saige

    Microsoft Office is better, because price problem is not everything.

  • Annika

    Microsoft Office is best. And if you use pirated version, best application even without paying…What I can say… Fabulous.

  • Quinn

    Microsoft office is much better. I had the Open Office in my PC, but I didn’t like the interface and options, outside it is quite heavy. Also really enjoyed the change of office 2007, and it is more practical.

  • Parker

    A great fight!

  • Joe

    I’ve been using open source, which by the way is almost the same thing as Microsoft Office, only change in Visual. Everyone knows that you shouldn’t judge a book by its cover, or for being cute or bad, first have to understand the content before the brands.

  • Kallie

    I myself prefer the Microsoft Office even I have to pay for it.

  • Norma

    I think it’s all a matter of conscience. I was very familiar with MS Office. But when I discovered what makes open source OpenOffice, save to PDF, open DOCX files, among many other things you need in MS Office, I certainly use OpenOffice and recommend it to everyone.

  • Christofer

    “But the support and the guarantees offered by Microsoft justify this value.”

    There are also options for commercial support of OpenOffice both from Oracle(for enterprises if I remember correctly) and from third parties. Your post is written almost completely to put M$ Office as the best option. You even put Franco the OpenOffice “fanatic” to admit disadvantages in OpenOffice.

  • D. B.

    Migrating a company from M$Office to OpenOffice is a problem if you’re dependent on M$Exchange/Outlook for email.

    The fact that large governmental entities are using GMail with OpenOffice speaks volumes!!

    The latest version of OpenOffice is full featured for 99.99% of most humans and is wonderfully good software. I was a MS Partner and got MS software for media costs but now I’ve switched to OpenOffice.

  • tech at work

    At my business we noticed an issue with compatibility and
    OOo 3, users could open a docx file in OOo edit it and save it, but the result couldn’t be opened in Word.

    The only way out of that was to tell people ‘if you intend to use OOo and Word, save in doc (2003) format’.

    Aside from that it’s a good suite

  • http://www.rsiny.com/ Rick Stanley

    Why is Bill, a supporter of Microsoft Office, and Franco, a fanatic …

    I have to wonder if you are not sitting on the fence in this article, but are a supporter of proprietary software? ;^)

  • http://thebeezspeaks.blogspot.com Hans Bezemer

    This is so poorly done, I don’t know where to start in order to write a comment. Did you have a hard night before you wrote this one?

  • markit

    You missed the real reason and strength of OpenOffice: is Free as in Freedom, the cost is the least important of it’s merits.
    It uses a standard, open file format (ODF, open document format) that everyone is free to implement and use, so YOU, users, are the owner of your files.
    With M$ chains, the file is owned by M$ that gently lets you use his M$Office to open it. The fact that someone else can also open M$closed format is just a undesired fact that M$ is trying to address with software patents.
    With OpenOffice, you can install it wherever you want, how many times you want, the version you want, on the operating system you want, for the purpose you like. M$Office has a more than 14 pages EULA that list all what you CAN NOT do with it.
    With OpenOffice you can get the source code, pay whoever you want to improve it, examine it, use it for other Free Software projects, or to integrate with what you like.
    M$Office is owned only by Microsoft, the only one that can modify it.
    The choice is not technical, is among Freedom and slavery. Maybe the cage could seem more confortable than the wild open, but the wise choice is obvious.

  • crassone

    Hi

    I have used openoffice for a longtime. Mainly because I cannot afford to buy software. In price its a winner. However, in every iteration of openoffice there has been problems printing envelopes. I cannot estimate how many envelopes I have wasted. This has been reported to the openoffice bugs team. But it continues to be a problem. Even yesterday I sent another complaint about this but I have also come to my senses. I dont think the bugs team are that interested and I have been reporting in vein. And as I told them I am switching. So for many things it maybe ok. But there are still unfixed bugs that have been left unfixed for years.

    As a contrast I printed the envelope I wanted in abiword with no problem. And Kword has the same problem as openoffice – which makes me wonder whether they share the same code base.